Unbelievably, a full 24-plus hours after Charlie Kirk was shot while giving a talk in Utah, no one has any idea about who the shooter is. We have a shirt, a hat, a face and, well, that’s about it.

That’s what you think if you’re of a normal mind. But if you’re not, like many people on the internet, you might have already started to question the gender of the person who did it. Heck, you might have begun to wonder if they’re transgender — and driven yourself insane trying to prove, for some reason, that they are.

On X (the everything app!), people have begun taking the few images and videos we have of the shooter and performing all sorts of visual “gender” tests on them. Do they have an Adam’s apple? Does their body shape conform to my idea of a man? How about their jaw line — is it a “dude’s” jawline?!

Of course, some of these people are also meeting some pushback. For example, a few people state their belief that, if the shooter is a trans man, they are a “biological woman” — and that no “biological woman” would be able to make such a direct shot. Really healthy brains we all have these days.

To get this out of the way, is there any validity to these tests? Of course not — these are the same people who think that both Marilyn Monroe *and* The Rock have also transitioned. But is it fun to point and laugh at these people? Naturally — until it isn’t.